(I actually got down to scribble some poetry ideas a few nights ago. More coming up soon, maybe.)
But I found this list of designer posters for Obama at evasion.cc (via)

(by Jude Buffum)




Walters then pointed out that he himself had used the lipstick line, but McCain held that Obama "chooses his words very carefully" and the reference was no accident.
(via NPR)
Because Wide Sargasso Sea can be seen, and was intended as, an answer and expansion to Jane Eyre I couldn't help but mainly focusing on the similarities and differences between these two novels. And there are plenty. On the one hand, there is the narrative voice. Of course, this difference is pretty obvious, as Jane Eyre is pretty much a classic example of an Victorian novel with a first person narrator that is as reliable as a first person narrator can be. But, I think, what is striking about Jane Eyre's narrative voice is that it is mature and self-assure in its tone, although through important parts of the book Jane is either young or confused or both. This is quite different in Jean Rhys's novel. Not only does the narrative voice change in the different parts of the novel, the narrative voices, in my opinion, are also at times more personal and often fittingly insecure. Especially in the first part of the book, concerning Antoinette's childhood dominated by confusion and anxiety as a result of the neglect of her mother and these sense of being in-between groups. This cannot only be felt in what is narrated, it can be also seen in how it is narrated, especially during the scene in which her family's house is burnt down.
An interesting commonality I see between Jane and Antoinette is the place the school – boarding or convent – takes in their lives. Both grew up in a insecure, rather harsh home in which both have to struggle with neglect and animosities. The prospect of going to school is a possibility of a safe haven. Both still have to struggle in school, but at least for Jane this more or less works out, she meets and finds friends in important and influential female figures in her life. Antoinette also considers the convent her refuge, but things do not work out as fine as they do for Jane.
The narrative voice in the second part of the novel is the point of view of Mr. Rochester. He, in my opinion, has some common features with Marlow's perspective in Heart of Darkness. He is also an Englishman in a situation and setting he fails to understand, recognize ,accept or at least tolerate when he visits Antoinette, her home and her family. Suspicious of all conventions and habits that in some way oppose or do not fit to 'proper' Victorian, English conventions. He tries to force everything into these conventions. This goes as far as renaming his wife Antoinette Bertha, in order to make her more English. Also, although he marries her, this is merely a convenient business and financial, rational act for him. Nd he treats the relationship with the professional, cold, matter-of-fact, one might say Colonialist attitude appropriate for the relation between two parties of a contract, but not of two lovers, at least in our modern understanding, despite all sexual contact.
Bertha is quite confused by this situation, desperately wanting him to love her, and even more confused, if not anxious, about the looming unknown goal and image that is England. To her this idealized place of Rochester's appears cold and scary, I think.
The novel appears to point out that this being torn between two her Caribbean self – which isn't all that stable either – and and the English other is part of the reasons that turn her into the madwoman in Jane Eyre. The book also seems to present the idea that Antoinette/Bertha appears 'mad' because the English society makes her appear mad by force and treat her accordingly. This makes me think of Said's Orientalism and the way i.e. African 'savages' are portrayed by Colonial powers such as Marlow in Conrad's Heart of Darkness.
If our system were truly about what harms, we would promptly legalize currently illegal things that are harmless -- gay marriage, pot, and Mexicans. Then we would criminalize currently legal things that are harmful -- nuclear weapons, Hummers, and the Gypsy Kings.


"'Well, you know right now America is in a state of upheaval,' he says. 'Poverty is demoralising. You can't expect people to have the virtue of purity when they are poor. But we've got this guy out there now who is redefining the nature of politics from the ground up... Barack Obama. He's redefining what a politician is, so we'll have to see how things play out. Am I hopeful? Yes, I'm hopeful that things might change."
I thought that it was interesting how lê thi diem thúy's novel The Gangster We Are All Looking For takes up the discussion of the blend of fiction and auto-biography we had when reading Kingston. The book is classified as fiction, and that is correct and true, but I still can't get around the striking similarities between the narrator and the author. Both came form Vietnam by boat, both lost a sibling through drowning. Normally, I don't like to take the autobiographical approach to a text. But in this case, it is so interesting, especially since lê herself made some decisions that pint towards this interpretation.
First, the autobiographical information is given in the book itself. And not only by the publishing company, in which case one could have argued that they tried to force a autobiographical connection between author and work to raise public interest i the book. But lê also includes the autobiographical in her author's note.
Further, lê decides to keep the author nameless, which has two results. The narrator is of a more general, floating character, the reader can give the narrator more identity. But in this case it is very likely that the reader simply takes the name for the narrator closest available – the author's voice. Of course, it is quite common for authors to use a lot autobiographical background as inspiration, but still I would argue that in this case, the border between author and fictional narrator is exceptionally blurred.
I rarely read a novel in which case the comments on the back fit so well with my own perception of the book as in this case. The Vogue quote says: “Breathtaking [..] Flows in luminous paragraphs that mingle past and present, creating a fluid sense of time”. I couldn't say it differently. I especially liked how the quite short paragraphs were so divided from each other. Sometimes the paragraphs felt just like a little shot, a little glimpse of time, in some cases the book was almost impressionistic. I was fascinated how the narrative pace suddenly changed halfway through the book, and a more or less external account of immigration turned into a quite emotional family story. I felt like being in a narrative swirl. And what especially fascinated me was that although all three family members were struggling in their own way, I never saw them a completely detached from each other. Somehow there always seem a loving connection between them. The way it was narrated, for example, the makeup process between mother and father after drunken rage and arguments never seemed like a bad idea to me, as in other cases. Despite all the strangeness and problems, this family still seemed to belong to each other.
"Is dir nur kalt oder hast du was gegen Juden?"
Bush, to Politico:
"I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal," he said in an interview for Yahoo! News and Politico magazine.
"I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the commander-in-chief playing golf," he said. "I feel I owe it to the families to be in solidarity as best as I can with them."
Hey, you know what sends the "wrong signal"? Invading a sovereign country based on cooked intelligence! Also, telling terrorists to "bring it on." Oh, wait, wait, you want totally crossed wires? A banner reading "mission accomplished."
Maybe he should stick to golf and give up wars.

"Die Creme ist eigentlich gar keine Body Lotion, auf gut deutsch g'sagt."
Interessant... Einer von nur vielen Tipps vom "deutschen Grillmeister". Andere Perlen sind auch z.b. der Hinweis, dass Fleisch mit Bier abzulöschen nichts bringt, außer Biergeschmack. Gee.Muss ich verbranntes Fleisch wegwerfen?
Nicht unbedingt. Wenn nur ein paar Stellen verkohlt sind, einfach Kräuter, Senf oder Paprika dazu essen. Das tötet krebserregende Stoffe ab!
"Ein gutes Rockalbum ist und war immer ein Mittel der Weltflucht, ein Ausweg in dein besseres Selbst. Mir geht es daraum, dass darauf etwas Außerodrentliches und Magisches geschieht; etwas dass den Alltag überstrahlt, statt ihn nur zu spiegeln. Politische Parolen kann ich auch ohne Musik haben."
Brot und Spiele im 21 Jh. Niemand läßt sein Leben. Keine wilden Tiere. Kein Blut. Nur Tränen hungriger Mädchen.
"Was kann Kunst überhaupt machen? Was kann meine kleine Scheißband im großen und Ganzen anrichten? Ich beantworte mir das so, dass wir einen bestimmten Zeitgeist befeuern, ihn dazu bringen können, sich bestimmte Fragen wieder öfter zu stellen"
“ Yes GAWKER, you and I, we are not so dissimilar are we. Only I use rather posh product and and am decked like the halls of an elephant exhibit.
XXOO ”
p.s. who the f is that woman you keep talking about who had a parade made out of pink vodka’s. also what is the beatrice, is that a restaurant? i will never know these things. I am chained to my insides like a self-contained coin operated writing machine.
of course, someone had to “comment” (oh, your commenters) that I have not written a good record since heartbreaker. well, either way I don’t have any trouble getting in and out of Barney’s and I don’t have to get on the yacht like mayer. poor mayer. er, rich poor mayer. can you imagine submitting album after album knowing they are going to ask for the track about girls.
bless his little over educated drop D tuning heart.
Monica Goodling -- former Justice Department liaison to the White House who admitted to Congress that she "crossed the line of the civil service rules" -- is under investigation by DOJ for her role in the firing of a department lawyer who was rumored to be a lesbian. "To some people, that's even worse than being a Democrat," a Republican source told NPR.

yes way!
From an interview with rapper DMX (via The Stump):
Are you following the presidential race?
Not at all.You’re not? You know there’s a Black guy running, Barack Obama and then there’s Hillary Clinton.
His name is Barack?!
Barack Obama, yeah.
Barack?!Barack.
What the fuck is a Barack?! Barack Obama. Where he from, Africa?Yeah, his dad is from Kenya.
Barack Obama?Yeah.
What the fuck?! That ain’t no fuckin’ name, yo. That ain’t that nigga’s name. You can’t be serious. Barack Obama. Get the fuck outta here.


“Not a chance,” he said. “If the Democrats can’t landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up, close down, and emerge in a different form.”
And let me tell you something — for the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country. And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change
"Running for campaign is like being waterboarded"
Täglich verliert die deutsche Staatswirtschaft 1 Mrd. Euronen, weil
Leute wie du sich auf der Arbeit so was wie das hier durchlesen.
Ein gutes Gefühl! Hahahah!
